Skip to content
OpenlyView

Advocacy Group Asserts to Have Extracted Countless of Audio Files from Spotify

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them online.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Observers said the apparent data breach could aid AI companies searching for material to develop their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor scraped public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Declared Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the breached music would probably be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced material is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has become a key issue between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.

About the author

Kenneth Schultz

A tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering AI, startups, and digital transformation across global markets.

OpenlyView

Type to search articles.